Skip to main content

Why do gay conservatives hate themselves so much?


I was just reading about the latest conservative representative to be caught in a gay[1] scandal—it seems to happen every six months or so—and it made me wonder why.

But it’s not; 'why do these people find themselves in this position?'—because being in the closet is likely to force them into these situations. And it’s not; 'why are there gay conservatives'?—that’s a topic for another day. The question I wonder is; 'why did these gay conservative legislators vote or promote anti-gay legislation?'

Because, inevitably, these people turn out to have voted against the interests of LGBTQ+ people.

Do they lack empathy, and think they have a get-out-of-jail-free card for themselves? Are they so full of self loathing that they do it to punish themselves? Do they think that if they pass one more piece of legislation, it might frighten themselves straight? Or are they using it as a beard? To hide the fact that they are gay? “You know, that guy Jim, he seems a bit gay, but he’s all for outlawing them gays, so he must be straight.

I really don’t get it.

I also wonder what LGBTQ+ conservative voters must be thinking when they vote for a conservative running for office. Because there’s no way to pretend that the current conservative agenda is good for those who are LGBTQ+. It’s not even LGBTQ+ indifferent. It’s clearly hostile.

In the current climate of conservatism, which is moving so quickly to put judges on the bench that will roll back social advances (once they get rid of Roe, they’ll move on to gay marriage, and then sodomy laws, don’t you worry!) I wonder what I would do if I was a LGBTQ+ conservative. Probably roll up in a ball and cry.

But I guess that when voting, the fear of higher taxes on millionaires can be more of a driver than personal freedoms, or who you can love.


1. I’ve used the term gay in much of this article because nearly all of the offenders are males who had sex with other males.


Tennessee state Rep. Bill Sanderson in a 2013 Grindr profile wrote: “I’ve seen a lot and done a lot, but I really haven’t had a connection with a guy and I have a burning desire to have that relationship.”

Sanderson supported several pieces of legislation including:
HB 600, banned municipalities from adopting ordinances prohibiting anti-LGBT discrimination.
HB 1840, allowed therapists to decline to see patients if they are gay.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Grammarly - Inconsistent punctuation fix bug

As I wrote in my previous post ( Grammarly - I think I like it ), I've been using Grammarly to proof my book. I'm still happy with it, but I did discover a problem it has with certain punctuation imported in a Word .docx file. One of Grammarly's features is a fix for 'Inconsistent punctuation.' It was upset that my files (which were .docx files exported from Adobe InDesign ) contained a mix of straight and curly apostrophe and quotation marks. I think the problem is that internally  InDesign fixes these issues in your original text on the fly, but if you export the text it sends out the original formatting rather than changing the punctuation. I figured that making this change in Grammarly was a good idea, but what I discovered is that after doing this, there were instances where single apostrophes and quotation marks were moved, particularly around a 'word' or if I had a single apostrophe next to quotation marks: "And then he shouted 'Fire!...

Grammarly - I think I like it

I’d seen the ads for Grammarly, a tool that promised to help me “ Compose bold, clear*, mistake-free writing with Grammarly’s AI-powered writing assistant, ” but I was skeptical. Maybe I didn’t want to spend the $139.95 a year it costs (there is also a $29.95 a month option.) [* that sentence came from Grammarly’s website, and Grammarly suggested changing the word clear.] This week I finally tried the free version, just out of curiosity, and after using it I was intrigued enough to get the paid version, a nd though it’s only been a few days, I like it. I’ve been running my book through it, and while we have a lot of disagreements (primarily over Unclear Antecedents), it has found enough spelling errors I had missed, and grammar and punctuation mistakes, to make me feel that it's worth the price. Pros • It finds spelling mistakes and grammar issues that I missed using other tools, and with multiple proof-readings. • It’s easy to use, though performance c...

Is Microsoft bringing Mr Clippy back?

Just after I paid for a year long subscription to Grammarly, Microsoft went and announced their own AI-powered grammar and style checker for Word Online: Ideas In Word .  According to the article, "Ideas for Word might propose swapping 'society as a whole' for the more concise 'society.'"  Oh come on, really? We're getting rid of all filler verbiage?! That's going to make things very short and concise and boring. Meanwhile, Google has announced it's own AI-powered grammar suggestions feature coming in Google Docs. Microsoft getting into AI-powered grammar checking reminds me of a certain utility that Microsoft offered a long time ago; Clippit, commonly referred to as Mr Clippy. Mr Clippy got a lot of—probably deserved—bad press. One of my favorite pieces about Mr Clippy was in an episode of Wait Wait Don't Tell Me  when the panel was imagining Mr Clippy being taken out and shot.