Skip to main content

This article rewrites very little of what we knew about the end of The Beatles

This week, an article appeared hyping an audio tape of one of the last meetings of The Beatles during their final days, and the article makes the claim: 'This tape rewrites everything we knew about the Beatles."

Before I go into full beast mode, let me note that no transcription or audio recording of the tape is provided, so maybe it does change 'everything we knew' about the end of The Beatles, but what is presented, does not change everything we know. Not by a long shot.

Synopsis: The article makes the claim that it's accepted history that The Beatles knew that Abbey Road was going to be their final album (Abbey Road is regarded by fans as their final album as it was recorded after Let It Be, even though Let It Be was released after Abbey Road.)

The article goes on to talk about a recording of a business meeting just prior to the release of Abbey Road, where John and George are talking about continuing after Abbey Road, while Paul seems less than enthusiastic.

“It’s a revelation,” Lewisohn says. “The books have always told us that they knew Abbey Road was their last album and they wanted to go out on an artistic high. But no – they’re discussing the next album."

Well, that's almost interesting, except I'm curious what books "have always told us" that they knew Abbey Road was going to be their last album. Certainly things were strained during that period, but if you'd asked me last week whether The Beatles set out to record Abbey Road, knowing it was going to be their last album, I would have said 'No.'

In fact, George Martin, in the Anthology TV program said "Nobody knew for sure that it was going to be the last one, but everybody felt it was." (Emphasis mine.) Ringo, in the same program, said that “It was always a possibility we could have carried on. We weren’t sitting in the studio saying okay this is it, last record, last track."

I always understood that there were a series of incidents that resulted in the ultimate demise of The Beatles, but that the two most notable disagreements were John, George and Ringo bringing in Klein as their manager, and Ringo turning up to tell Paul not to release his solo album on the same date as Let It Be. The latter happened long after Abbey Road was recorded. I never understood that they had decided that Abbey Road would be the last album, so the whole premise of the article seems suspect.

Or maybe I've been reading the wrong books.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Grammarly - Inconsistent punctuation fix bug

As I wrote in my previous post ( Grammarly - I think I like it ), I've been using Grammarly to proof my book. I'm still happy with it, but I did discover a problem it has with certain punctuation imported in a Word .docx file. One of Grammarly's features is a fix for 'Inconsistent punctuation.' It was upset that my files (which were .docx files exported from Adobe InDesign ) contained a mix of straight and curly apostrophe and quotation marks. I think the problem is that internally  InDesign fixes these issues in your original text on the fly, but if you export the text it sends out the original formatting rather than changing the punctuation. I figured that making this change in Grammarly was a good idea, but what I discovered is that after doing this, there were instances where single apostrophes and quotation marks were moved, particularly around a 'word' or if I had a single apostrophe next to quotation marks: "And then he shouted 'Fire!&#

Grammarly - I think I like it

I’d seen the ads for Grammarly, a tool that promised to help me “ Compose bold, clear*, mistake-free writing with Grammarly’s AI-powered writing assistant, ” but I was skeptical. Maybe I didn’t want to spend the $139.95 a year it costs (there is also a $29.95 a month option.) [* that sentence came from Grammarly’s website, and Grammarly suggested changing the word clear.] This week I finally tried the free version, just out of curiosity, and after using it I was intrigued enough to get the paid version, a nd though it’s only been a few days, I like it. I’ve been running my book through it, and while we have a lot of disagreements (primarily over Unclear Antecedents), it has found enough spelling errors I had missed, and grammar and punctuation mistakes, to make me feel that it's worth the price. Pros • It finds spelling mistakes and grammar issues that I missed using other tools, and with multiple proof-readings. • It’s easy to use, though performance c

Debugging Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing - Internal Error

I’ve been setting up my next book in Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP.) This is the second book I have published through KDP, and it’s a reasonably straightforward process.   I first uploaded a draft of the book and cover months ago to check that I had the formatting right. This is something I recommend doing; if your text layout goes into the trim area, or has some other problem, the upload will be rejected. You want to make sure your design is right before you finish the layout of your whole book.     Anyway, I just finished the manuscript and went to upload it and the updated cover. When I did, I got an Internal Error for both the cover and the book. That confused me, as I hadn't made significant changes to the formatting. I tried uploading the previous version of the text and cover—the ones that had uploaded successfully some months ago—and got errors on those too!     I tried some different things uploading different versions and managed at one point to get the original cover to